Playing with Story

A couple of months ago I went to a workshop at the Henry Grube Education Centre put on by Andrea Wallin and Melissa Hunter on helping students to develop stories by playing with loose parts and prompts. Story Studio. Drawing from the book StoryMaking, we explored several ways to engage students more deeply with story creation. Normally these kinds of elementary focused workshops are hard to translate into lessons or projects for secondary students, but I had seen the power of using loose parts at our Battle of the Books competition last year, so I had a few ideas.

Before I could really put anything together, COVID-19 happened and we were suddenly faced with a different way to teach and learn. When I asked my grade 8s what they wanted to do, they said they didn’t want to spend all of their learning time on the computer. I decided that this would be a good opportunity to give story making a try. We began with our own version of the Ishi book. This was something that we had tried at the workshop, and it made for a great way to assess my students’ tech skills as well as help them adjust to this emotionally challenging time. The results were fantastic!

A fun story that mixes Greek, Roman and Cheyenne mythologies, so it’s a natural way to include local indigenous stories!

Although the idea for story making is for students to make stories, this seemed like an ideal time to modify the approach for a final project on the novel we were just finishing, The Lost Hero, by Rick Riordan.  I wanted them to analyze a scene from the story and then write about it. Building a model seemed like a fun way to begin.

I quickly realized two things: I needed to model every aspect, and more importantly, they needed to do more that just build a model and write about it.  I didn’t want a summary of the scene,  and that’s what would have happened if I hadn’t remembered a key part of our workshop where we used post it notes to add ideas and questions to our loose parts. I wanted students to really question perspective in their scenes – what did people know, hide, secretly wish? Were there people or opinions missing? What did different characters think about each other and the situation? With some great feedback from Andrea and Melissa, the final project came together.

When students began building their models and reflecting on their scenes, it was so exciting to see how they were paying attention to details and using their post it notes to ask really thoughtful questions. I believe that it was this use of interrogating their model that lead to some wonderful, deep thinking, as well as creating the visual that so tangibly showed relationships.

I feel that this use of story making could be so useful in other secondary level courses and assignments: modelling and interrogating an historical event, choosing and building a moment for a memoir, analysing dense stories, or even creating a new one – the original idea for the workshop.

In creating this assignment I put together several videos for my students that modelled every stage of the process, as well as videos, example outlines and even a final written piece (which was much longer than I had initially wanted so it became our A+ model). If anyone reading this blog wants to view any part of the assignment, examples or videos, please contact me. I am happy to share it all!

Works Cited

Compton, Michelle K., and Robin C. Thompson. Storymaking: The Maker Movement
Approach to Literacy for Early Learners
. 2018.

Riordan, Rick. Heroes of Olympus, The, Book One The Lost Hero. Disney-Hyperion, 2010.

Yabuki, Akiko. ISHI A Solid Rock, www.ishitherock.com/.

Here’s Looking At You…

Digital Artifact – Post 3b

The Tech Drawer – Find the Right Tool for the Right Task
www.techdrawer.weebly.com

I believe that the words proceeding great scientific discoveries aren’t “EUREKA!” but “Hmmm… isn’t that interesting.” I feel like that describes by process with this digital artifact. I started out wanting to make tutorial videos and figure out how to sort and embed Twitter posts. In the end I did just that. However, I also ended up making a webpage and opening up several new projects to get onto once this course is done. Isn’t that usually how it goes.

Tutorial Videos
I definitely need to work on wrapping things up more quickly. The two that I made with Screencastify were about 9min long. They cover everything you need to know, but I’d like to aim for 5 min in the future. I supose that 9 min isn’t bad considering they’re from our Tech Ten sessions – 10 min long. Screencastify is easy to work with. I ended up paying for the year long subscription so that I could have more features, but it was a pretty reasonable price. It has a very basic editor, but frankly I really wasn’t looking for anything more sophistocated (or else I would have used my camera, green screen and Premier Pro… maybe next year)

Twitter Feeds
This was what I was really wanting to figure out during this course, and I’m glad I did. I learned a lot about using Twitter lists and collections. In the website for the different courses I have embedded either lists or collections. The lists are nice because they update themselves, but sometimes there is one account that posts more than the others, so it dominates the feed. I think I will probably make all of them just collections, but I’ve created lists for each course and set the list and collection for each subject next to each other in Tweetdeck so that I don’t have to drag them so far. What is really handy with Tweetdeck is that my TL partner and I can both use it, so it won’t be so onerous a task to update. We can also schedule tweets from our SLLC account, so we’re going to give that a shot. Should make it a little easier to get them out regularly and early enough in the morning that people can read them before the school day gets going.

Web Design Choices
I decided that if I was going to do a website, I should do a bit of research and get the design right – or at least attractive and practical. The website I liked the most that had some great tips was 27 Research-backed Web Design Tips… Yes, there really are 27 tips. Honestly, I was impressed with the information that this guy gives away (or maybe doesn’t give away – I think I have to sign up for the blog to get to that blog post any more). I also really appreciate why companies need to hire good website designers – not just to get the code right (I hear a lot about that at home from my partner who does network engineering), but there are many important aspects to visual design.

For instance, I spent 2 hours on a silly picture for my tab called Student Tech Tub. I got the background of the picture to match the other pictures, and then I realized the picture was the wrong colour, so it didn’t balance the weight of the black clock on the left. I was so happy when I got it right and my son said (in the wisdom of a 13 year old) “That looks dumb.” He was right though. I went the literal direction, and not for the visual description of what that tab is about.

Because I was using a Weebly template, a lot of the tips had already been taken care of. Here are the main tips I spent the most time with.
1) Visual Hierarchy,
2) Descriptive Phrase – what site is about,
15) Descriptive navigation – put most important items in the header
20) Write meaningful subheads
10) Use People Pictures – especially your people
11) is to avoid using stock photos of people
14) use colour to guide visitors’ attention
8) avoid carousels and rotating sliders – this drives me nuts with our new school district / school websites; stacking is better
19) avoid putting social media icons in the header – put them in the footer.
22) avoid jargon, use simple words
23) list order – important stuff at the beginning and end
24) answer visitors’ top questions – actually something really important to anticipate with this website so I could design it well

Oddly, #s 2, 15 & 20 were the ones that were the most obvious, and the most obviously missing. I made sure that I added short descriptions at the top of each page so people would know if they were in the right place. Keeping them short kept everything simple. That was another tip – use whitespace and keep things uncluttered. When I compare the new website to the current SLLC website, I can really feel the difference. I find our old site cluttered and too busy.

I also changed the hyperlink text from light grey to dark blue with green hover over – couldn’t see the light grey. Who thought that was a good idea? It goes along with tip #1 – using colour contrast helps to draw the eye to important items. I had added a Feature Article as part of the home page (frankly, it looked too sparse otherwise), and the article had a lot fo great links that were washed out with the original colour scheme. It made the article painful to read.

In the end…
I think I’m happy with the website so far. It has a skeletal feel to it because there is still so much to add for the courses and the student page. However, I think the structure of it works really well. I really also like all of the input I was able to get from my TL partner, teachers for different subjects, and students. In some cases it required more finicky organization for different courses (sometimes Weebly is a royal pain if you want a heading or divider just so), but I think the overall effect was worth the effort. The people using the website had a say in its design, so hopefully that will translate into better usage. It’s an obvious step – getting the input of the users, but one that so often we just don’t do, and one that I know I lament frequently. Only time will tell now how well all of this planning pays off.